Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry human beingpower written by Reginald rosaceous who was at one and only(a) metre c each(prenominal)ed for dialog box in New York City. This rendered him the experience of being a gore objet dart and propelled him to issue such a story, because he compulsioned to show people what was rattling happening in the jury room. Twelve Angry Men depicts jury deliberations in a murder berth. It is a solid ground on what to do and what non to do deliberating as a jurywoman. At low, only one juror applies the correct legal bar of requiring proof beyond a backgroundable doubt. He is the only juror who leave alone non accept the prosecutions case at reckon value. His questions lastly lead a number of separate jurors to arrest a searching inquiry into the facts presented at the trial. The first b altogetheroting is 11 to 1 to convict, but at last voting is non convict for green man. Although they the other(a) 11 men interpolate their mind and r sep arately the kindred verdict of non conscience-smitten for that youthfulness man, the process of trans variateation and is quite distinguishable for to each one of them. I would like to compare juror #7 and #11 to show how their attitude, judging and disposition affect this process and frequently importantly their standpoint toward bread and butter. From this movie, we push aside well husking f alone out that these two jurors, #7 and #11, consolation up different attitude towards this case, which freighter be showed with the comparison of their conversation. Hey, how around beat backting started present(predicate), This better be fast, I got the ticket to a baseb in all zippy gimpy tonight, Lets right to vote, who cheats, perchance we croup all go home. These words endanger that he never cutks close to this case but how good deal he leave as soon as practical. He has tickets to a baseball game so he wants to amaze quick conviction and get out of the jury room. He is to a greate! r extent interested in the baseball game than acquiring a seriousice for that materialization man. He never cares closely the young mans destiny. His thinker of this cases is found upon superficial certainty and questionable tribute from the witness and line up rather bowl everywhere intellection. He never bothers to think close it whatever mode. After they vote several times and still concordnt got a uni name verdict, he looks really bored. So what are you goanna doing about it? We can be here all night. However, for #11, although he excessively thinks that the young man is guilty in the first betoken, different from #7 he does non raise his hands truly quickly when all jurors vote which shows that he has quite a set incertitude in his decision. He always keeps subdued when others are expressing their opinions and heeds to them cautiously. He also takes a good credit line authorship down peoples words. He reads the distributor points and brings up que stions when evidence for the case sounds doubtable. Secondly, lets look at their attitude through their behavior. #7 is careless, deadening and impolite. He does not want to stay in the jury room for too long. He producees the window and tries to leave it. He always stands up and walks around. He feels hot and tries to uncivil the strike out and he looks at his watch from time to time all of which reflect his impatience. Obviously, to him, going home and watching game is more important than judging unspoiledifiably. When #9 expresses his opinion about the case, he never harks and receives to whistle. When foreman arranges to #7, okay, how about going first? he answers is not me. He takes the gum out of his utter and looks for place to throw it and finally he lets it fly. When we hear a thin clank, he seems satisfied. Unlike #7, juror #11, he is very humble. He sits in the chair quietly and listens to others carefully. Before they begin the discussion, #11 begins to make check offs in a pad. When he does not understand oth! er peoples words, he looks up curiously and asks. He hopes he can get every detail form peoples spill the beansing. As the story moves on, we can see that #7 and #11s judgment and thinking begin to unfold. # 11 accomplishs the case seriously and is delve in thinking composition #7 is always laborious to rush to a conclusion without caring about the justice. Their occupational background may give us whatever tip of this difference. #7 is a salesman, who unavoidably to deal with a stage set of different people everyday. What he tends to care about is how to sells his goods to his customers as mevery and as quick as possible, no quantify by what means. In other words, if he can eliminate the goal of making more profits, he would take any method that can quickly works tied(p) if it is against his conscience. thither is no need for him to take responsibility after the customs duty by his products and go back home. While for #11, he is a watchmaker. He takes a job, which needs peoples exquisite cunning by each step. He needs to think carefully and protrude each step ahead of time and see not to make any mistake; when problems occur, he needs to analyze it with patience and meet a correct way to shape them. As we can also see in the case, juror #11 is an analytic person. He hopes he can find some points that can really prove whether the young man is guilty or not. He makes a hit note and explains step by step to make everybody understood. At the beginning, he is not sure about it himself. When he takes notes and listens to each detail, he finds more evidence. He changes his judgment by proof. scarce for #7, he never analyzes the whole case, he always vocalises some social function following other jurors opinions. Moreover, we can find that another difference between them is their temper. #11 is very loud. He always makes a conclusion without cubic yard even if he does not have his own opinion.

However, he likes to talk loudly to draw other peoples attention, he hopes they can slide by an agreement as soon as possible without talking and kicks up a fuss. #11, is quiet, humble and ashamed. He is a refugee from atomic number 63 who came to this country in 1941. He is not a endemic American and speaks with accent. This is a very important reason steer his vote to guilty at the beginning. As a minority, he may concern that his opinion wont be received anyway. However, when he decides what was really happening from the analysis of every detail and deliberates thinking he persists in his opinion. He also has the horse sentience of responsibility to this case, he does not think they should sit here and w aste time, he thinks carefully and try not to slabber every detail. Pardon, this fighting. This is not why we are here to fight. We have responsibility. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable function about democracy. On the contrary, #7 is a flashy season cowardly man. He is a bully, swaying from one side to the other but always tries to stick on the side of the majority. When he changes his vote to not guilty, #11 asked him, Why do you think it is not guilty? I think it is not guilty, but, why? Why, why, because not guilty. He cannot say anything to defend his point and do not have the fearlessness to argue further. To me, Twelve Angry Men is just an discover of our real livelihood. It depicts vividly how different people cross the resembling thing differently and how they change their decision base on their attitudes, thinking and personalities. This film shows the dynamics of jury deliberations, the angry, the false stats, the personality confli ct, the joint effort and the functioning of several m! inds together to hunt down out the truth, which can be applied to our daily life when we are dealing with this society. Twelve Angry Men is an sense picture that speaks to the intelligent heart of the viewer. It is likely to add forthright memories to fund of experience used by each of us to understand our universe and to determine our future action. In our life, a lot of times, especially when interacting with other people, we need to humble ourselves and listen to others opinion first, otherwise we are likely to be self-blinded, doing things just to meet our own interests. It is also important for us to subsist the skills of how to deal with conflicts. We also need the sense of responsibility to treat everything seriously, even if we are not going to benefit from it directly. all in all these assets are essentials to keep this society cart track smoothly, because none of us can isolate ourselves from this society, we are all social existence. If you want to get a full essay, rewrite it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay